HearQA vs Gong
See how HearQA compares to Gong for AI-powered interview, exam, and certification assistance.
HearQA
AI copilot for interviews, exams, and certifications
From $0 / $89.99/month
Free plan + Session Pack ($44.99 one-time)
Gong
Revenue intelligence platform — post-call analytics + deal-stage tracking
$1,500–3,000 per seat / year
Enterprise contracts; min 5 seats; ~$25k annual minimum for most teams
Feature Comparison
| Feature | HearQA | Gong |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free / $89.99/mo / $44.99 one-time / $599.99/yr | $1,500–3,000 per seat / year |
| Platform | Web + Mobile (any device) | Desktop SaaS — records calls via Zoom / Meet / Teams integration; web dashboard for review |
| Real-Time Transcription | Yes (on-device) | No |
| Video & Camera Capture | Yes | No |
| Document AI | Yes (upload study materials) | No |
| Interview Coaching | Yes (all types) | No |
| Exam Assistance | Yes | No |
| Languages | 8 | English only |
| Works Offline | Real-Time Transcription: Yes | No |
| Free Plan | Yes (3 sessions/month) | Yes |
Why Choose HearQA Over Gong
In-call coaching, not post-call review — HearQA surfaces the BANT / MEDDIC / objection-handling framework while the customer is mid-sentence, not a week later in a coaching session
Self-serve $89/mo (Pro) or $44.99 one-time Session Pack — affordable to individual AEs and bootstrapped teams without a procurement cycle
Document RAG over YOUR battlecards, prior call notes, persona docs, customer briefs — answers come from your specific context, not generic patterns
Practice → Sales Roleplay sub-type for rehearsing hard objections before the live call — Gong has no equivalent (it's a recorder, not a simulator)
Multi-language live transcription + framework prompts across 8 locales — useful for AEs running international territories
Works on phone, iPad, or desktop — phone for in-person prep, desktop tab audio for remote calls, no install needed
Gong Limitations
- Post-call analytics, not in-call coaching — the rep finds out what they should have said AFTER the deal slips
- Enterprise pricing puts it out of reach for most individual AEs and pre-Series-A teams ($25k+ annual minimum)
- Setup requires admin / IT involvement; no self-serve trial path
- Talk-time and topic tagging are pattern-recognition, not framework recall — a rep on the call still needs to know the BANT / MEDDIC / objection-handling framework themselves
- Heavy on data ('here's what successful reps do'), light on in-the-moment intervention
Pricing Comparison
HearQA Plans
- Free$0/month
- Pro (Monthly)$89.99/month
- Session Pack$44.99 one-time
- Pro (Annual)$599.99/year
Gong
- Main Plan$1,500–3,000 per seat / year
- Enterprise contracts; min 5 seats; ~$25k annual minimum for most teams
Frequently Asked Questions
Should we replace Gong with HearQA?
For most teams, no — they solve different problems. Gong is the post-call analytics layer (deal-stage tracking, at-risk surfacing, manager-coaching workflows, cross-call talk-pattern analysis at team scale). HearQA is the in-call coaching layer (real-time framework recall, document RAG, Practice rehearsal). The right comparison is what your team is currently missing: a 50-rep org with weak deal-stage hygiene needs Gong; a 5-rep team where reps fumble objection handling live needs HearQA. Many teams run both — Gong for retrospective review and rep coaching at scale, HearQA for the live moment when a rep needs framework recall mid-call.
How much does Gong cost vs HearQA?
Gong starts at ~$1,500–3,000 per seat per year on enterprise contracts, typically with a 5-seat minimum and ~$25k annual minimum total. Procurement cycles take 30–90 days. HearQA Pro is $89.99/mo per seat ($1,080/yr), with $599.99/yr annual billing for ~$50/mo effective. Session Pack is $44.99 one-time for 5 sessions in a 7-day window — useful for an SDR's hard month or an AE preparing for a single high-stakes deal cycle. The pricing-tier difference is structural: Gong's economics work for 25+ rep organizations with admin / IT bandwidth; HearQA's economics work for individual reps and 1–25 rep teams without procurement overhead.
Can HearQA replace Gong's manager-coaching workflows?
Partially. HearQA's session history captures every call as a searchable transcript with auto-extracted action items and value-anchor moments — a manager can review the calls a rep flags for coaching. What HearQA doesn't do is Gong's cross-rep team analytics (which talk patterns correlate with closed-won across 100+ calls), the at-risk-deal surfacing model, or the formal manager-tag-and-coach workflow. For 1–10 rep teams, the gap doesn't matter — the manager is on most calls anyway and coaches in 1:1s. For 25+ rep teams, Gong's structured coaching workflow is genuinely load-bearing.
Does HearQA do the same call-recording-and-transcription that Gong does?
Yes for the call itself — HearQA's tab-audio capture in Chrome desktop transcribes both sides of a Zoom / Meet / Teams call in real time, and the session summary captures the transcript + auto-extracted action items + draft follow-up email. The architectural difference: Gong stores everything centrally for cross-rep analytics, with admin-controlled retention policies and Salesforce sync. HearQA stores per-user with the user controlling their own session history. If centralized cross-rep analytics is the value driver, Gong wins; if per-rep in-the-moment coaching is the value driver, HearQA wins.
Can HearQA integrate with Salesforce / HubSpot like Gong does?
Not natively today — HearQA's session summaries are exported via copy-paste into the CRM rather than synced via API. The roadmap consideration: native CRM integrations are highest value for teams running 20+ calls/week per rep where copy-paste overhead compounds; for 5–10 calls/week (typical AE rhythm), copy-paste is fine and the rep retains more nuance from the call than an auto-synced summary captures. Gong's native CRM sync is a real advantage for high-volume teams; HearQA's per-call human-in-the-loop summary preserves more useful detail for considered renewal / expansion conversations.
What's the AE workflow when running both Gong and HearQA?
Pre-call: HearQA Practice → Sales Roleplay to rehearse the harder objections; upload the battlecard + persona docs to HearQA's library. Live call: HearQA on phone (or in a desktop browser tab if running tab-audio capture) for in-the-moment framework recall; Gong recording in the background as it does today. Post-call: Gong's automated CRM sync + at-risk-deal surfacing; HearQA's session summary for the warm follow-up email. Manager 1:1: Gong for cross-call coaching at scale, HearQA's session history for the rep's self-review on specific tough calls. They divide the timeline cleanly — different tools for different stages of the same deal.
Is HearQA detectable by the customer the way some teams worry about Gong's recording?
Different mechanism, different concern. Gong records the call (with the customer's notification per Zoom / Meet / Teams policy and most jurisdictions' recording-consent laws); the customer knows the call is recorded. HearQA on the rep's phone is unremarkable — the customer doesn't know HearQA exists, but the call itself isn't being recorded by HearQA from the customer's side; only the rep's mic captures what the rep hears. The recording-consent obligation falls on whoever is recording; Gong takes that on, HearQA delegates it to the platform-level recording (Zoom Cloud, Meet recording) that the rep already manages.
Ready to try HearQA?
Sign up free and start your first session today.
HearQA opens to everyone in a few days — we'll email you the moment it's live.